smilin’ through the first night blues

Today’s Gallup polling shows Obama and McCain in a dead heat at 45% each. After watching a good deal of CNN coverage of the DNC last night I’m already hearing James Carville and David Gurgen saying, “See, I told you so!” For me, at least, the convention coverage on CNN and MSNBC last night was not so much biased — I think media folk are reacting to the Clinton’s claim that primary coverage was biased in favor of Obama — so last night’s coverage was not so much biased as it was dominated by political consultancy clichés of the sort that Gurgen and especially Carville are very apt to contribute to any free-wheeling discussion.

It was as though some media sultan had decreed from on high that coverage of the DNC should be critical. And critical it was. The Democrats did almost nothing right, according to these media sages, though Gurgen was more generous than Carville and both had praise for speeches by Ted Kennedy and Michelle Obama. But Jim Leach was yanked off the stage in mid rant by some invisible TV hook, and Claire McCaskill never got on the CNN stage at all as the pundits dismissed her appearance as an unfortunate payback for her support of Obama during the primary campaign.

But I was very pleased with my party’s first convention night. I thought Nancy Pelosi’s opener was fine and the minor speeches were OK, what I heard of them. The business that was done reminded us all that political conventions are the performance of democracy, not just long TV commercials. I was drawn to the commentary of Donna Brazile, who seemed always to smile through the cant, as if to say “Yes, the Obamas do know what they’re doing” as others were vociferously claiming the opposite.

Of course the media love to cover negative stuff. One of the CNN people, I forget who, exclaimed ruefully last night that the Republicans are so good at negative campaigning and the Democrats are so bad. But there’s more interesting polling today showing that Americans prefer Obama to McCain on the economy by a margin of 52% to 40%. And there’s even polling data showing that Obama is ahead on taxes, as this video explains:

So I’m less disheartened than I might have been if all signs seemed to indicate that my guy is truly losing ground. Bad economic times have tended to be good for democrats. And today, I have support form an unexpected quarter, a David Brooks column that agrees with me (more or less). Says Brooks, “The Democrats are in danger of doing to Obama what they did to their last two nominees: burying authentic individuals under a layer of prefab themes.” And Brooks reminds us all of the Iowa Caucuses, which I also remember. It was a heady sight to see all the young folk fill up the room to cast votes for our guy back then.

Michelle Obama was wonderful last night, and Ted Kennedy made me cry. I do so hope he lives to see Obama inaugurated and to ‘get health care done’ with him. I can’t praise Michelle Obama as well as my friend, Sharon Shaw. does. So check out “Michelle rocks” here. I wish there were no negatives to this but fear there are. There are always the Clintons and their surrogates (James Carville is such a surrogate), who still seem bent on upstaging Obama at every turn. And then there’s the lingering shadow of racism, unacknowledged for the most part. Bob Herbert reports this morning on several conversations with voters in the Midwest that have led him to form his “own (very arbitrary) rule of thumb regarding the polls in this election:

Take at least two to three points off of Senator Obama’s poll numbers, and assume a substantial edge for Senator McCain in the breakdown of the undecided vote.

Using that formula, Barack Obama is behind in the national election right now.

If Herbert is right, and democratic primary results from Texas, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia (among other places), suggest that he is, Obama needs to fight back against the other side’s exploitation of his difference. Not by attacking racism but by playing hardball with McCain. As Brooks puts it, Obama gets points as he argues “that McCain is a good man who happens to be out of step with the times.” Of course, the Obama campaign is doing this, just not foregrounding it at the convention, at least not now.

And now for some more good news. A couple of days ago I stopped by an Obama headquarters station here in the city to pick up some bumper stickers and a yard sign and had no luck. They were out of everything and told me that signs and stickers, etc. disappeared as soon as they got them in. “Come back an a couple of days,” they said. “But call before you come.” I was whistling “Happy days are here again,” as I got in my car.

home from Door County and back to school with Obama, who is no Michael Phelps and no St. Patrick either

No posting from Door County, but here’s a picture of The Alpine, the funky old-fashioned resort where we stay there. It sits right on what I take to be the harbor in Egg Harbor that opens out into Green Bay (not the town, the body of water). I love the place, love especially to sit on the porch and read — though I have to say that listening to Johnny Belmont and the Fabulous Cheeseheads runs a close second. I try never to miss the Cheesehead dances. They’re always crowded and feature various musics. I tend to like dancing to rock chestnuts like “Taking Care of Business” and “YMCA” rather than to the tunes that belong to my generation. That’s partly because almost everybody in the room dances to the rock tunes, grandmothers and geezers like me, young moms and kids, and even some teenagers and their youngish parents. I also love the chicken dance and the polkas.

Which reminds me to say that polka is Czech. I never knew that before last summer when my beloved and I spent some time in the Czech Republic. I recall dancing with a fine, strapping Czech person of the feminine persuasion who startled me by exclaiming “heeyaah” a good many times rather loudly in my ear during the experience. Apparently Czech women do this to indicate pleasure, though I can’t imagine having been the cause of such a thing. At any rate, polka is Czech, and the famous song which in the US begins with the words “Roll out the Cheese Whiz” (as the Cheeseheads’ have it), is really a sad song in which a woman dumps her lover . . . no heeyahs there. My good polka memories also extend to an Oktoberfest back in Denton a couple of years back when we danced to music from Brave Combo, who play a mean chicken dance.

I had resolved to hate the Olympics, but I failed to do so. Mostly because I became a fan of Michael Phelps as he swam his way to contention with whoever breaks all his records thirty years from now. It was a little sad to see past winners Mark Spitz and Mary Lou Retton as youth surpassed them, though they are hardly irrelevant and many of their exploits will remain in media libraries to be parsed by whatever future comes. The crowd of them makes me think of Houseman:

So set, before its echoes fade,
The fleet foot on the sill of shade,
And hold to the low lintel up
The still-defended challenge-cup.

And round that early-laurelled head
Will flock to gaze the strengthless dead,
And find unwithered on its curls
The garland briefer than a girl’s.

A commentator for an online pony thinks that “Housman’s cynical view of life may have a certain perverse appeal for young people” but scolds that the poet “neglects to mention that people . . . remember important men and women who lived well beyond middle age.” Houseman was a better classicist than this commentator, who, though he knows the ages of Sophocles, Queen Victoria, and a long list of other luminaries who died old, like Houseman’s Mithridates, doesn’t seem to remember that the classical tradition recognized two sorts of fame: one earned over a long life, such as that of Odysseus, and the other earned by brilliance in youth followed by early death, such as that of Achilles. And the fleeting nature of all fame is also a classical trope. But let that go. It’s clearly time for me to go back to school.

Speaking of racers, my guy Obama has seemed a bit underwhelming for a while. His FISA vote really disturbed me, because I need to be able to hope for the restoration of the rule of law by an Obama presidency. His campaigning since the trip to Europe has seemed pretty lackluster. And now he has participated in a widely publicized conversation with Rev. Rick Warren and John McCain that has given Warren license to claim that he has helped the rest of us understand Obama’s world view. If this claim were true, I doubt that Wm. Kristol would be crowing in The New York Times that McCain “won” the conversation and calling for Warren to replace one of the media types scheduled to moderate the three TV debates scheduled this fall. Apparently McCain “won” because he interpreted a question about evil not in a theoretical way, as Obama did, but as a question about, what else, 9/11. I am so sick of this horse shit and of the way it is hyped as profound, and I’m almost angry at Obama for lending himself to it. If he wished to put his piety on display, he’s certainly not chasing any snakes out of the country with it.

Then I remember Jeremiah Wright, and I realize that the hallmark of my guy’s campaign has been to accept a host of arbitrary and unfair “tests” of himself and his abilities as he continues to allow white voters the luxury of thinking that they live in a post-racial society. Shelby Steele, whom I’ve mentioned before, is good on the racial dilemma that Obama faces, and now Adam Serwer has written another good piece at The American Prospect arguing that Obama only loses if he acknowledges the racism to which campaigns against him have appealed, first the Clintons and now McCain, the Paris Hilton ad being only the most recent in an ongoing series of coded racist messages about the Illinois senator.

According to Serwer, we have now reached a point at which “saying the race card has been played is actually the ultimate race card.”

The McCain campaign’s apparently race-neutral approach, and its subsequent accusation that the Obama campaign is playing the race card, is a well-thought-out strategy — it is pure Nixon. In his recent chronicle of conservative political history in The New Yorker, George Packer describes Pat Buchanan’s plan for exploiting political divisions, particularly ones of a racial nature. Buchanan’s assessment was that they could “cut the Democratic Party and country in half; my view is that we would have far the larger half.”

Is there a counter strategy? None, as Serwer sees it. “The brother needs to keep it together. There’s simply no way he can win this one.” Obama needs to stick to policy. So I hope for the future he’ll not venture into any other megachurches where his successes can be turned against him.

It’s very much like the racially charged sentiments of some white basketball fans that black basketball players are overpaid. No one resents franchise owners for being fantastically rich, the same way no one resents McCain for being fantastically rich, because presumably, their riches are “deserved.” But fans do resent the players for million-dollar salaries the same way the Obamas are resented as elitists for owning one nice home.

Back to Michael Phelps and fame. I have to think, too, of Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, and the other African American basketball players who are presently carrying the day for the U. S. in Beijing. If they win it all, they’ll be touted as having reversed a condition brought about by past teams of overpaid professionals who had a poor work ethic. If they lose, they’ll be painted as overpaid professionals (read black professionals) with a poor work ethic.

well, that was quick . . .

Two editorials with similar leads, yesterday and today.

It has taken Carlos Brito only a few days to start cutting philanthropy. Grant’s Farm, long operated as a public service by Anheuser Busch, will no longer be open during the week–not cost effective. Read the Post editorial here.

And it’s not taken John Mccain long either to break his boast not to run a negative campaign. Read the Times editorial about how McCain has adopted Carl Rove’s playbook here.

Tomorrow, I’m traveling to Door County, Wisconsin, where my beloved and I have spent a few days each August for several years. I may write a post or two from there.

more about some of the same snakes

Snakes: My first post on this topic explained the rationale for the title. Maybe I should think of the category as “variations on the trope, ‘Let’s talk about snakes.'”

Obama in Berlin: My guy has now spoken at the Victory Column in Berlin, in spite of my reservations and those of some other observers. Deutsche Welle quotes statements from various German pols who seem to have thought as I did a couple of days ago. But today I’m thinking of the size of the crowd Obama drew in Berlin, close to 200k, and also of the column’s association with contemporary political and popular culture. As Puja Deverakonda points out, “[T]he Column’s symbolism and importance to German history culture has already evolved.” Deverakonda also suggests that “Obama’s Siegesäule visit is supposed to allude to another victory: his own.” That suits me fine, even though it has already given McCain opportunity to aim a shot at Obama’s internationalist rhetoric.

Anheuser-Busch InBev: Back before the sale, Obama also lamented the loss of Anheuser Busch to InBev, striking a note that resonates with a good many here in St. Louis and prompting predictable criticism from pols and pundits that he is “anti-trade.” In order to consummate its forced marriage with A–B, InBev will sell off some assets, borrow $45 billion, cut the St. Louis workforce, and, non-profits fear, scale back philanthropy. There may be some long term good in this for the city of St. Louis, but most people here don’t see it now. With everybody from Claire McCaskill to Lewis Black after him Carlos Brito has got to feel like one ugly Brazilian.

Lambeth Conference: I haven’t paid overmuch attention to the news from Lambeth Palace, but it appears that the bishops, as usual, are up to no good. The latest flap appears to concern a Buddhist chant that Bishop Duleep de Chickera, of Colombo, Sri Lanka, used to conclude a sermon. The sage and serious Robert Duncan is quoted at Stand Firm to the effect that “the inclusion of the chant was ‘very, very troubling’ since it was an ‘invocation of something other than the God we know.'” One of his colleagues has posted a trenchant disagreement at the Lambeth bishops’ blog. Apparently Bishop Duncan shot from the hip, as he often does.

But Duncan’s remarks are among the mildest at the Stand Firm post. I’m sure that many will share the Bishop’s thought that Buddhist=unChristian, no thought required, and pile on. Indeed I’m beginning to expect that the entire conference will be a series of flaps like this one. We’ve already been treated to stentorian condemnations of gays and lesbians and demands for Gene Robinson’s resignation. It’s too bad. My bishop, George Wayne Smith, has expressed the hope that the Anglican Communion will survive this meeting in spite of boycotts and the walkouts that are likely.

I’m having trouble caring very much about the communion any more. Bishop Smith confesses to some emotional exhaustion. Perhaps I’m feeling some of the same. But I’m getting really tired of the pretensions of the so-called orthodox.